Businesses, educational institutions, medical centres and other users could have multiple contracts with the owners of the land on which they sit. But the Master Facility Agreement replaces all these other contracts. On a legal issue, the Master Facility Agreement outperforms all other contracts. Each master-facility contract is different, but most say how much rent a user has to pay each month to work on a field. Most of them also contain a date when the original master facility contract expires and a new contract is to be negotiated. These agreements also provide for certain prohibitions: a municipality may, for example, prohibit a university that leases its land from building multi-storey car parks that degrade the views of neighbouring owners. Municipalities could also limit manufacturers to certain operating hours to reduce noise pollution in the late evening. A master-facility contract regulates every step that a hospital, college, production plant or other user must perform to lease land. If users violate their master-facility contract, they should expect penalties under the contract. These penalties will vary, but may result in penalties, rent increases or, worse, redundancy. Given the importance of the master-facility contract, it makes sense for users not to sign such contracts until their legal representatives have been able to carefully study the documents. Signing a master-facility, which, for example, severely limits the ability of companies to add new furnishings or increase the number of their employees, can affect the success of these businesses.
Framework contracts are detailed contracts that clarify all the key factors of a business transaction. Master-facility agreements are a subset of these contracts. An agreement on a master`s institution lists the provisions that an institution – often a college, hospital or other large user – accepts when renting land to municipalities, states or private groups. The terms activated (when not defined in these specific conditions of the facility) have the meanings of clause 1 (definitions) of the framework facility contract. It is recognized and agreed among the parties that the EFSF bonds (the first tranche securities of the EFSF) made available at the discharge of the first tranche in order to make the payments of the first tranche will be issued in advance by the EFSF and kept in reserve, as described in recital 10 of the Master Facility Agreement of July 31, 2012 or before July 31, 2012. This bank recapitalization facility is governed by point 6 of the framework facility agreement. The EFSF has received legal advice from the recipient Member State and the FROB advisor on these conditions specific to the ease and forms of legal assistance set out in Appendix 2 (legal opinion) of the Framework Agreement on the Main Facility.